Thursday, February 17, 2011

Dmitri Khalezov and Gordon Duff return for two full hours!













Note: Due to technical difficulties (Mossad hack?) this show was not archived in a timely fashion at American Freedom Radio - but you can listen to an enhanced version here, thanks to EddieLeaks.org!

Truth Jihad Radio Fri. 2/18/11, 1-3 pm Central, American Freedom Radio (archived here.) Call-in number: (402) 237-2525 or post your questions to my Facebook page.

Special two hour interview with intelligence community whistleblower Dmitri Khalezov and Veterans Today editor Gordon Duff.

Did an infamous Mossad agent named Mike Harari brag of organizing 9/11? Dmitri Khalezov, author of The Third Truth About 9/11, was arrested in Thailand along with Mike Harari. Khalezov says Harari was his friend at the time of 9/11, invited him to a party on 9/12/01 celebrating the successful operation, and subsequently let it be known, in so many words, that he, Harari, was an organizer of the 9/11 false-flag event.

Gordon Duff,
editor of Veterans Today, knows the intelligence community well and says Khalezov should be taken seriously as a potential witness in the 9/11 mass murder case.

Note: Next Monday, 2/21/11, my first hour guest will be journalist George Mapp Jr., who met and wrote about incarcerated arms dealer Viktor Bout, has published an article on Dmitri Khalezov (then another one here), and writes extensively about CIA/DEA agent David Headley, organizer of the Mumbai terror attack, at his blog.

5 comments:

  1. This was an amazing show. Unfortunately American Freedom Radio messed up on this week's archive. (Maybe they got hacked by Harari?) Let's hope this show gets archived soon!

    ReplyDelete
  2. It looks like AFR has hardly archived any of it's shows since 2/15...I certainly hope TJR shows get posted soon, I'm tired of checking!

    Cheers

    ReplyDelete
  3. Kevin, what are your views regarding Khalezovs point about the missile attack on the pentagon being used as a pretext to convince " American leaders " that the planes were also carrying nuclear weapons and as a result, making the decision to demolish the buildings in order to prevent a nuclear explosion? Not so much the logistics, but in terms of the actual logic of such an idea.

    It doesn't make much sense to me. Is Duff Khalezov's handler? Was Dmitri compromised? lmao

    ReplyDelete
  4. Dmitri Khalezov made interesting claims about the approval by local and federal US government officials of engineering plans for underground thermonuclear explosive devices for the "emergency demolition" of modern steel-framed buildings built in the USA in the 1960s and 1970s.

    He further claimed that the existence of engineering plans to use underground thermonuclear explosions for "emergency demolition" of modern steel-framed buildings was not a military secret, even though US federal government agencies would obviously impose secrecy and strict physical security on the actual implementation and periodic maintenance of such engineering thermonuclear devices.

    Such engineered explosive devices obviously could not be allowed to be stolen, or detonated by unauthorized personnel. Maintaining security and operability of the devices would incur significant ongoing risk and cost.

    Presumably New York City government officials would have to be routinely informed by US federal officials of the existence and operational procedures of the thermonuclear demolition devices beneath WTC1, WTC2, and WTC7, but the decision to use them to carry out an "emergency demolition" of the towers would plausibly require the approval of the President of the United States, or his acting delegate, and the concurrence of the US Secretary of Defense.

    Khalesov recalled that a New York Port Authority building engineer discovered evidence of the thermonuclear demolition infrastructure below the WTC, and blew the whistle in New York City newspapers in the early 1980s. If this claim can be verified by archival research or witnesses, then we can stop scoffing at Khalesov's claim that US authorities may have actually approved plans for thermonuclear demolition of modern steel-frame towers.

    Even if underground thermonuclear demolition devices were originally engineered beneath the WTC towers, they were not necessarily used on 9-11. Maybe the devices had been decommissioned, but still served as a useful cover story for the conspirators.

    If underground thermonuclear explosions were used to shatter the steel and concrete of the WTC towers, other explosives may also have been used for over-kill, for enhanced control, or for visual special effects.

    Can we recruit a petroleum geologist to carry out a seismic study of the granite bedrock beneath the WTC Ground Zero? Or do we borrow a leaf from the NIST playbook, and refuse to waste time looking for something that we KNOW isn't there...

    ReplyDelete
  5. "... there is no way around this conclusion." States Dr. Niels Harrit referring to World Trade Center Building 7.

    Dr. Niels Harrit (retired associate professor of chemistry) and his team at the University of Copenhagen published a paper in The Open Chemical Physics Journal and verified that red/grey particles of non-reacted nanothermite was found in the dust of the WTC buildings. This finding is irrevocable proof -- the veritable DNA -- that "Office Fires" and jet planes did not bring down the three buildings on that fateful day. 9/11 has been the prima facie excuse for incursions of the U.S. and NATO into foreign nations, the sole justification for suspension of our domestic civil liberties and the common denominator of "The War on Terror".

    http://www.vimeo.com/20574556

    ReplyDelete