Thursday, August 21, 2014

VT icons Jeffrey Silverman and Stew Webb on NWO world takeover

Broadcast August 22nd, 10-11:00 a.m. Central (1500 GMT) on, archived here. Note: subscribers can listen to shows on-demand before they are broadcast - and also get free downloads! If you are a subscriber, just log in to the members area of and go to the "Private Blog" to get early access to the shows. 


 First half hour: Investigative reporter and agronomist Jeffrey Silverman has exposed illegal US bioweapons activity in the Republic of Georgia - and much more. In this interview, we discuss ISIS beheadings and other symptoms of the NWO world takeover bid; and Jeffrey predicts that corrupt imperial-Zionist forces, specifically the CIA-drug-money Deep State that created and trained ISIS, will soon be staging a coup d'├ętat against Turkey's fragile democracy.

Second half hour: Stew Webb is a long-time thorn in the side of the CIA-drug-dealing Bush Crime Family and the rest of the NWO posse. Here we play the segment from Wednesday's Veterans Today Radio show in which I participated, with Stew hosting.

Wednesday, August 20, 2014

ISRAEL DELIBERATELY MASS-MURDERS CHILDREN: Debating hyper-Zionist Chuck Morse on mainstream radio

Broadcast August 20th, 10-11:00 a.m. Central (1500 GMT) on, archived here. Note: subscribers can listen to shows on-demand before they are broadcast - and also get free downloads! If you are a subscriber, just log in to the members area of and go to the "Private Blog" to get early access to the shows.  

Radical Zionist Chuck Morse
Jeff Sawin is a Las Vegas, Nevada mainstream radio host who doesn't care if he gets fired - he's going to tell the truth and take the consequences. Last week Jeff brought me on his show to debate a neocon-Zionist radio host named Chuck Morse. The results weren't exactly pretty - but they were pretty much so that Chuck is going to bring me on his show at 10 a.m. Eastern next Monday, August 25th.

This episode of Truth Jihad Radio features  the debate with Morse and Sawin from last week.

During the debate, Chuck Morse hotly denied that Israel targets civilians including children. Here are some links proving the contrary:

Palestine: the assault on health and other war crimes (from British Medical Journal): "Two thirds of the 621 children (two thirds under 15 years) killed at checkpoints, in the street, on the way to school, in their homes, died from small arms fire, directed in over half of cases to the head, neck and chest—the sniper's wound. Clearly, soldiers are routinely authorised to shoot to kill children in situations of minimal or no threat."

Child-killing sociopaths of Israel

 IDF Film Sniping Children Playing on Rooftop in Gaza:

Israeli Sniper: "I Killed 13 Kids Today":

Israeli strike kills four Palestinian children playing soccer on Gaza beach:

Israeli lawmaker: "Kill the children ('little snakes') and their mothers too!"

 448 children killed in Israeli attacks on Gaza, UN says

Israel Kills – For The Fun Of It

From "Gaza Diary" by Chris Hedges: 
It is still. The camp waits, as if holding its breath. And then, out of the dry furnace air, a disembodied voice crackles over a loudspeaker.  

"Come on, dogs," the voice booms in Arabic. "Where are all the dogs of Khan Younis? Come! Come!"  

I stand up. I walk outside the hut. The invective continues to spew: "Son of a bitch!" "Son of a whore!" "Your mother's cunt!"  

The boys dart in small packs up the sloping dunes to the electric fence that separates the camp from the Jewish settlement. They lob rocks toward two armored jeeps parked on top of the dune and mounted with loudspeakers. Three ambulances line the road below the dunes in anticipation of what is to come.  

A percussion grenade explodes. The boys, most no more than ten or eleven years old, scatter, running clumsily across the heavy sand. They descend out of sight behind a sandbank in front of me. There are no sounds of gunfire. The soldiers shoot with silencers. The bullets from the M-16 rifles tumble end over end through the children's slight bodies. Later, in the hospital, I will see the destruction: the stomachs ripped out, the gaping holes in limbs and torsos.  

Yesterday at this spot the Israelis shot eight young men, six of whom were under the age of eighteen. One was twelve. This afternoon they kill an eleven-year-old boy, Ali Murad, and seriously wound four more, three of whom are under eighteen. Children have been shot in other conflicts I have covered—death squads gunned them down in El Salvador and Guatemala, mothers with infants were lined up and massacred in Algeria, and Serb snipers put children in their sights and watched them crumple onto the pavement in Sarajevo—but I have never before watched soldiers entice children like mice into a trap and murder them for sport.

Monday, August 18, 2014

Richard Gage on 9/11 debate challenge, Howard Ross on Stephen Salaita & academic freedom

First half-hour: Richard Gage AIA discusses the new 9/11 Debate Challenge from Architects and Engineers for 9/11 Truth. is putting up $1,000 in the faint hope of enticing a credentialed building professional to defend the NIST version of what happened to WTC Building 7 in a public debate. Richard also discusses his recent appearance on C-Span, and the AE911Truth billboard that's going up in New York's Times Square - in a direct challenge to the New York Times and its 9/11 cover-up - throughout the month of September.

Second half-hour: Howard Ross, former Dean of Letters and Science at the University of Wisconsin-Whitewater, blew the whistle when I was politically blacklisted and denied a tenure-track Islamic Studies/Humanities job in 2006. (Permanently blacklisted from the whole UW system, in 2011 I issued a $1,000 9/11 debate challenge asking any University of Wisconsin teacher to debate me and explain why my views are wrong; none are willing and able to do so.)

In this interview Howard Ross, who hired politically blacklisted professor Steven Salaita for his first teaching job, reflects on the sorry state of academic freedom, and freedom in general, in the American academy and the society around it. He suggests that Salaita's views on Gaza are legitimate criticisms of Zionism run amok, and critiques the brutality and militarization of American police on display in Ferguson, Missouri.

Friday, August 15, 2014

Rick Shaddock, Professor Anthony Hall and other guests discuss 9/11 debate challenges!

NEW TIME SLOT! Live show is pushed back two hours!

Friday 8/15 - Listen live - 8 to 10 pm Eastern on Revolution Radio:  To be rebroadcast Saturday 7/26 11 to 12:45 pm Eastern on  and then archived at the usual spot.

Richard Gage AIA and Architects and Engineers for 9/11 Truth have launched a $1,000 9/11 debate challenge! (My interview with Richard Gage will be broadcast this coming Monday.)

On today's live show, we'll discuss the history of 9/11 debate challenges with Rick Shaddock of the Association for Nine-Eleven Truth Awareness (ANETA) - and try to find someone to argue in favor of the official story. We'll discuss AE911Truth's debate challenge and billboard challenge to the New York Times. In the second hour we'll bring on Jim Fetzer and Globalization Studies professor Anthony Hall of the University of Lethbridge to talk about academic freedom and the Orwellian suppression of 9/11 truth.

We were hoping that some guy named Frank McLaughlin from the anti-9/11 truth site JREF will show up to debate Rick Shaddock during the first hour. Rick is a "computer professional for 9/11 truth" who has been trying to find a qualified JREFer willing to debate either physicist Dr. David Griscom or himself. Frank, who like Rick is a computer professional, at first appeared willing to debate - but then started generating endless excuses for weaseling out. Will Frank show up? Or will Rick have to debate an empty chair? Tune in and find out!

I take these debate challenges personally. Having been politically blacklisted from teaching in American universities, starting with the "sifting and winnowing" University of Wisconsin, I issued the first-ever $1,000 9/11 debate challenge several years ago. My point: If the University refuses to employ me due to my interpretation of 9/11, it needs to show why my interpretation is not only wrong, but so egregiously wrong that it makes me unemployable. Yet not one of the thousands of teachers in the UW system will defend the 9/11 Commission's "19 hijackers" myth in a debate - even for $1,000 (since doubled to $2000).


I was employed by/through the University of Wisconsin-Madison as a teacher or paid scholar every year from 1995 through 2006. Then in summer 2006 State Rep. Steve Nass (R-Whitewater), apparently egged on by Karl Rove and Lynn Cheney, launched a witch-hunt demanding that I be fired from teaching due to my research on 9/11. Since the witch-hunt, I have been repeatedly turned down for positions I am qualified to teach. (I was never turned down for any teaching jobs prior to the witch hunt.)

A member of the hiring committee in UW-Madison Asian Studies stated that the committee was told in 2007 that I could not be hired for political reasons. I was also turned down for a tenure-track Islam-Arabic-Humanities position at U.W.-Whitewater - they closed the position and returned the funds to the feds rather than hire me - purely due to my 9/11 research, according to whistleblower Howard Ross, then UW-Whitewater's Dean of Humanities. Likewise, the University of Illinois-Urbana closed a tenure-track Islam-Humanities position for which I had applied, and for which I was eminently qualified, rather than hire me.

Having repeatedly seen universities close positions, or hire less-qualified individuals, when I apply for teaching jobs since the 2006 witch hunt, I have concluded that I have been informally blacklisted due to my high-profile research, publication and activism on 9/11.

Why the blacklisting?

A well-connected UW-Madison professor told me that the day after I appeared on Sean Hannity's Fox News show the University lost more than half a million dollars in cancelled contributions to the Engineering school from private donors in less than 24 hours - and also expected to take a hit in federal funding. That very day (July 11th 2006) as the University was losing over $500,000, Provost Patrick Farrell called me and begged me to stop giving interviews. His first words were: "Kevin, you're killing us!"

So I have concluded that nobody from the University will defend the 9/11 Commission, not even for $2,000, because:

1) They suspect that I may be right and/or capable of winning the debate and embarrassing them;


2) They suspect that their own livelihoods and reputations, and the fiscal well-being of their department and institution, could be damaged by any attempt whatsoever to pursue the truth about 9/11.

Or as Upton Sinclair put it: "It is difficult to get a man to understand something, when his salary depends on his not understanding it."

I sympathize, to some degree, with the cowardly professoriat of the University of Wisconsin. They are living in fear and insecurity. What a sad way to live.

But I have no sympathy for the mega-cowards who attacked me in the media but refused to debate me. These individuals are utterly despicable. Here are their names, emails, and telephone numbers:

Donald Downs (608) 263-2295 

Downs is a political science professor who poses as a defender of academic freedom. He was quoted in the media in July 2006 as ridiculing my research on 9/11 (which he knew nothing about) and saying that though I couldn't be immediately fired from teaching, the best thing would be to never re-hire me after my semester contract was up. (The University has followed his advice, thereby depriving me of my livelihood and robbing me of roughly two million dollars in projected lifetime earnings.) When I asked Downs in 2006 to defend the 9/11 Commission in a public debate, he initially expressed interest, then weaseled out. He also refused a request by the UW-Madison History Club to debate me. He has continued to chicken out of debate challenges ever since.

Ann Althouse  (608)262-2444 

Law professor Ann Althouse has flung dozens of insults my way: "nutty," "despicable," "Nazi," "klansman." Naturally she won't debate me - she apparently doesn't realize hurling ad hominem attacks while refusing debate amounts to conceding that I'm right and she's wrong. As a trained law professor, she could easily win a debate...if I were remotely as far off base as she says. But she won't do it, even for $2000.

Marshall Onellion  (608) 263-6829 

Like Downs and Althouse, Onellion knew nothing about my research when he insulted me in the media:

..."He's a fruitcake," says Marshall F. Onellion, a physics professor at the University of Wisconsin. "He has no education in any engineering or science area pertinent to how, or whether, buildings fall down when hit by airplanes. Since he can't evaluate the evidence presented, he shouldn't have an opinion" that will influence students...

Since Onellion obviously thinks he can evaluate evidence better than I can, he should have confidence in his ability to win a debate...right? Wrong. The coward has repeatedly refused my debate challenge.

Onellian even insulted my religion, claiming that I should not be allowed to teach Religious Studies because I am a Muslim and therefore "biased." (Never mind that most Religious Studies teachers in America are Christian, and nearly all Jewish Studies teachers are Jewish.)

This bigot apparently fears he will lose a debate about physics and engineering - his two specialties - to a humanities scholar. Even $2,000 wouldn't compensate that kind of humiliation.

So feel free to call and email these people, copying to:

Tuesday, August 12, 2014

Maisoon Rice: Telling truths that even George Galloway can't handle!

Broadcast August 15th, 10-11:00 a.m. Central (1500 GMT) on, archived here. Note: subscribers can listen to shows on-demand before they are broadcast - and also get free downloads! If you are a subscriber, just log in to the members area of and go to the "Private Blog" to get early access to the shows.  

Displaced Palestinian Maisoon Rice sends out the best available email digest of Palestine-related articles. She's an outspoken truth-seeker - so outspoken that even George Galloway is afraid to let her call in to his show! Banned from George's show, she's a natural for Truth Jihad Radio. In this interview we discuss Zionist media domination and its talking points ("rockets, hamas, tunnels"); the hidden history of the New World Order satanists and pedophiles; Galloway's 9/11 truth deficit; the use of the sacred holocaust narrative to legitimize genocide in Palestine; and much more.

Monday, August 11, 2014

Danny Schechter: Israel is bad for the Jews!

Broadcast August 13th, 10-11:00 a.m. Central (1500 GMT) on, archived here. Note: subscribers can listen to shows on-demand before they are broadcast - and also get free downloads! If you are a subscriber, just log in to the members area of and go to the "Private Blog" to get early access to the shows.  

Danny Schechter "The News Dissector" is one of America's leading media critics. Though he's Jewish himself, he is now being called an anti-Semite, a Jew-hater, a Nazi - you know the drill - because he dares to speak out about the "Big Lie" (Chris Hedges) of Israel's propaganda narrative...and the fact that Zionist Israel is worse than apartheid South Africa (Chomsky).

Danny responded by deploring his AIPAC-loving nay-sayers as the totalitarians they are. For them, he says: "Dissent, however mild or reasonable, is not permitted. It's always their way or the highway! We are supposed to hail AIPAC the way the Romans hailed Caesar."

In this interview we argue a little bit but stay generally good-humored and congenial. As a former mainstream media insider turned whistleblower and critic, and a principled American Jewish voice with an acerbic sense of humor, Danny brings a much-needed perspective to this topic.

Check out Danny's two latest articles:

How Israel Trashes Judaism

Israel Is Bad for The Jews, Part 2

Monday, August 4, 2014

Henry Herskovitz: "We're winning the battle against Zionism!"

Broadcast August 11th, 10-11:00 a.m. Central (1500 GMT) on, archived here. Note: subscribers can listen to shows on-demand before they are broadcast - and also get free downloads! If you are a subscriber, just log in to the members area of and go to the "Private Blog" to get early access to the shows. 

Henry Herskovitz of Jewish Witnesses for Peace and Friends just sent out this report:

We're Winning (One man's view)

4,200 miles on a motorcycle through ten states including Colorado and Wyoming netted us the following observation: There were only two rather feeble responses to the anti-Israel bumper stickers and garments worn, when in the past there were many. In addition, the force and anger of the offended viewers previously contained much more heat (always little light) than the two this year. True, many racist heads were turned away from the sentiments on the t-shirt, but only two had the courage of their convictions to mount anything close to an offensive. We conclude it's just getting harder and harder to claim any defense for the vicious Jewish state and the war crimes it commits.

In this interview Henry describes the huge shift in public opinion he's witnessing as more and more Americans wake up and turn against Zionism. We discuss all of the most controversial related topics, including the Holocaust Religion and its heretics.